Anonymous Christian

  • Facebook
  • Google
  • SoundCloud
  • STAY CONNECTED

  • HOME
  • ABOUT US
  • BLOG
  • E-BOOKNEW
    • Other New Christian Books
    • Parable of the 5 Wise and 5 Foolish Virgins by Lord Jesus Christ with Church Fathers in First Christianity and Protestant Reformers Martin Luther & John Wesley
    • Almsgiving and Atonement Mystery – Essays in First Christianity Book
    • Lake of Fire – Hope for the Wicked One Day? – Essays in First Christianity Book
    • First Christianity – Thirty Sixty and Hundredfold Mystery Book
    • Book of 1Enoch – Christ Centered Universalism Mystery – Essays in First Christianity
    • Lost Orthodoxy (Paternal Light – Heart of the Gospel through the Eyes of the Kings of Christian Theology) St. Justin Martyr and St. Irenaeous of Lyons
    • Saviour of The World Book
  • AUDIO
  • LYRICS
  • GALLERY
    • PHOTO
    • VIDEO
  • CONTACT US

OUR BLOG

  • An example of a Math Olympiad Problem

    Anonymous Christian
    Sep 5, 2014
    MATH, Math Olympiad
    Comments Off on An example of a Math Olympiad Problem

    Question

    I have four children. The age in years of each child is a
    positive integer between 2 and 16 inclusive and all four ages
    are distinct. A year ago the square of the age of the oldest
    child was equal to the sum of the squares of the ages of the
    other three. In one year’s time the sum of the squares of the
    ages of the oldest and the youngest will be equal to the sum
    of the squares of the other two children.
    Decide whether this information is sufficient to determine their
    ages uniquely, and find all possibilities for their ages.
    Answer
    Let a>b>c>d be the ages of the kids. And their values belong to the interval [0,16]. One year back, their ages would be (a-1),(b-1),(c-1) and
    (d-1) respectively. We are told that ” year ago the square of the age of the oldest
    child was equal to the sum of the squares of the ages of the
    other three.” This gives us,

    (a – 1)^2 = (b – 1)^2 + (c – 1)^2 + (d – 1)^2 …(1)

    For the statement, “In one year’s time the sum of the squares of the ages of the oldest and the youngest will be equal to the sum of the squares of the other two children.
    ” means,

    (a + 1)^2 + (d + 1)^2 = (b + 1)^2 + (c + 1)^2 ….(2)

    We use the “identity” below to “simplify” things :
    ( x + 1 ) ^2 = ( x – 1 )^2 + 4x.
    Just set x = a,b,c,d respectively to get :
    ( a + 1 ) ^2 = ( a – 1 )^2 + 4a.
    ( b + 1 ) ^2 = ( b – 1 )^2 + 4b.
    ( c + 1 ) ^2 = ( c – 1 )^2 + 4c.
    ( d + 1 ) ^2 = ( d – 1 )^2 + 4d.

    Put these into (2) to obtain :
    (a + 1)^2 + (d + 1)^2 = (b + 1)^2 + (c + 1)^2 becomes :
    (a – 1)^2 + 4a + (d -1)^2 + 4d = (b -1)^2 + 4b + (c – 1)^2 + 4c
    Call this last expression as ( 4 ).

    We get from (4), (a – 1)^2 equals the expression below.:
    (b -1)^2 + 4b + (c – 1)^2 + 4c – [ 4a + (d -1)^2 + 4d ]

    We get from (1), (a – 1)^2 equals the expression below :
    (b – 1)^2 + (c – 1)^2 + (d – 1)^2

    “equate” (a -1)^2 in (4) & in (1) above to get,

    (b -1)^2 + 4b + (c – 1)^2 + 4c – [ 4a + (d -1)^2 + 4d ]
    = (b – 1)^2 + (c – 1)^2 + (d – 1)^2

    “Note that (b -1)^2 and (c -1)^2 appears on both sides of the equation above and can be cancelled”… simplifying, the above will reduce to :

    4b + 4c – [ 4a + (d -1)^2 + 4d ]
    = (d – 1)^2

    or,

    4 ( b + c ) = (d – 1)^2 + [ 4a + (d -1)^2 + 4d ]
    4 ( b + c ) = 2*(d – 1)^2 + 4 ( a + d )
    2 ( b + c – a – d ) = ( d – 1 )^2 …(5)

    Consider the “last” equation (5) above. d -1 even means that
    d must be odd. d is in [2,16] Thus d >= 3 , that is “d is bigger or equal to 3”. Since the “ages are distinct”, Thus c >= 4,
    b >= 5 & a >= 6. Similarly, since a <= 16, b <= 15, c <= 14 and d <= 13.

    In (5) & the information above awe have,
    b + c – a – d <= 15 + 14 – 6 – 3 = 20.
    So, ( d – 1 )^2 = 2 ( b + c – a – d ) <= 2*40 = 80
    That is (d – 1)^2 <= 80 or (d – 1) <= 8.95 or
    d <= 9.95. Since d is odd, thus the “possibilities” for d are
    d = 3 , 5, 7, 9.

    We consider each of the 4 cases based on the value of d separately.

    Case 1 ( d = 3 ).
    (5) becomes,
    2 ( b + c – a – 3 ) = ( 3 – 1 )^2 = 4
    b + c – a = 5 or b + c = a + 5.
    Substitute a = ( b + c – 5 ) into (1) and simplify to get,
    15 + bc = 5* ( b + c ) means 5 divides bc. Consider for “simplicity” 15 + xy = 5*(x + y) instead. With b > c implies,
    max ( x,y) = b and min(x,y) = c. With this “assumption” it helps us because now we can “assume without loss of generality that” let x be a multiple of 5. Since in [2,16] the multiples of 5 are : 5,10 & 15. We set x = 5, 10 , and 15 to get the corresponding values of y. For x = 5, equation becomes
    3 + y = 5 + y giving the “contradiction” that 3 = 5!. For x = 10, we get 3 + 2y = 10 + y or y = 7. For x = 15, we get,
    3 + 3y = 15 + y or y = 6.
    Hence solutions are (x,y) = (10, 7) & ( 15 , 6) Since b > c, this implies, (b,c) = (10,7) or (15,6).
    For (b,c) = (10,7) , b + c = a + 5 gives a = 12.
    Solution here is (a,b,c,d) = (12,10,7,3).
    For (b,c) = (15,6), b + c = a + 5 gives a = 16.
    Solution here is (a,b,c,d) = (16,15,6,3).

    Case 2 ( d = 5)
    (5) becomes,
    2 ( b + c – a – 5 ) = ( 5 – 1 )^2
    b + c = a + 13
    We put a = b + c – 13 into (1) and simplify to get,
    89 + bc = 13 ( b + c ). Use above ( b + c ) = 13 + a to get,
    89 + bc = 13 ( a + 13 ) = 13a + 169.
    bc = 13a + 80.
    Note that since a >= 6,
    13a + 80 >= 13*6 + 80 = 158. and by the last equality above,
    implies bc >= 158. Call this (6).
    If b <= 13 implies c <= 12 and bc <= 12*13 = 156 < 158 contradicting (6). So b >= 14 and earlier we showed b <= 15. So either b = 14 or 15. We proceed below :
    If b = 14,
    89 + bc = 13 ( b + c ). becomes 89 + 14c = 13*(14 + c ) giving
    89 + 14c = 182 + 13c , that is , c = 93 [ not possible for us because in our case c <=16 ].
    If b = 15,
    89 + bc = 13 ( b + c ). becomes 89 + 15c = 13*(15 + c )giving 89 + 15c = 195 + 13c and that is, c = 53 [ not possible for us because in our case c <=16 ].
    Thus there are NO feasible solutions that satisfy our problem in this case.

    Case 3 ( d = 7 ).
    (5) becomes,
    2 ( b + c – a – 7 ) = ( 7 – 1 )^2
    b + c = a + 25
    Now, from a >= 6, its a + 25 >= 6 + 25 = 31. So, b + c >= 31. But since b <= 15 & c <= 14, we get b + c <= 29 which contradicts “b+c>=31” above. Hence no solutions in this case either.

    Case 4 ( d = 9 )
    (5) becomes,
    2 ( b + c – a – 9 ) = ( 9 – 1 )^2
    b + c = a + 41 implies b + c > 41 but we saw from above that
    b + c <= 29; Hence a contradiction and no solutions for this case as well.

    To conclude the only solutions are as follows:
    (a,b,c,d) = (12,10,7,3) or (16,15,6,3).

    To “check”, use a calculator and consider for both cases of solution above :

    For (a,b,c,d) = (12,10,7,3),
    11^2 = 9^2 + 6^2 + 2^2 and
    13^2 + 4^2 = 11^2 + 8^2

    For (a,b,c,d) = (16,15,6,3),
    15^2 = 14^2 + 5^2 + 2^2 and
    17^2 + 4^2 = 16^2 + 7^2

    End.

anonymous-christian

Jonathan Ramachandran is founder at AnonymousChristian.org which serves as a Christian Blog discussing the Greater Hope of Biblical Christian in Christ Alone. He is also an IMO (International Math Coach) and a featuring Guitarist for many bands.

Advertisement

Recent Posts

  • Dialogues – FAQ and Doctrine to Possibilities
  • Bible and Church Fathers Quotes for Charity Doctrine
  • Water of Life – Two References 1000 years Apart in Chiliasm Timeline and meaning of Unsaved with the Shepherd of Hermas, St. Papias and St. Irenaeous
  • Mystery of the Marriage of Christ and His Church through the Eyes of the Direct Disciples of the Apostles only
  • Earning Salvation Fallacy and God’s Commands by Faith Mystery to the Endless Beauty of His Written Word

Search

Advertisement

Categories

  • ages of Ages (21)
  • AIMO (4)
  • AMC (1)
  • APMO (3)
  • Apostolic Fathers (6)
  • ASMO (2)
  • Book of Enoch (6)
  • Calculus (2)
  • Charity (14)
  • Christian Leaders (45)
  • Earning Salvation Fallacy (3)
  • Fatherless and Orphans (13)
  • First Christianity (53)
  • Foreigner (1)
  • Forever (10)
  • Free Choice (17)
  • Gehenna (20)
  • GMC (2)
  • Godliness (2)
  • Gospel Hope for Non Christians (75)
  • Hate and Love (9)
  • Head Covering (5)
  • Heavens Definition in First Christianity (18)
  • Holy Bible Aionion Edition (12)
  • Hundredfold Mystery (4)
  • ICAS (1)
  • IJMO (1)
  • IMC (1)
  • IMO (11)
  • Jewish Hell (11)
  • Justice Human Law (3)
  • KBAT/HOTS (1)
  • KMC (3)
  • Lake of Fire (20)
  • LGBT (2)
  • Marriage (8)
  • Math (174)
  • Math Olympiad (154)
  • Math Olympiad Classes (11)
  • Math Olympiad Primary (11)
  • Math Olympiad Secondary (10)
  • Millennial Reign (8)
  • Money Matters (11)
  • Music (1)
  • Non Elect Salvation (6)
  • Old Testament (6)
  • OMK (14)
  • Parent Children Duty (2)
  • PMONK (4)
  • Poem (1)
  • Preterism (1)
  • Probability (3)
  • Purgatorial Hell Universalism (33)
  • Puzzle (12)
  • Rapture (3)
  • Reason (1,799)
  • Recapitulation (7)
  • Repentance Afterlife (12)
  • Sabbath and Tithes (5)
  • Sadhu Sundar Singh (2)
  • Saints (5)
  • SASMO (4)
  • Shadow of Death (10)
  • Shepherd of Hermas (12)
  • Sibyline Oracles (9)
  • Singapore Maths (3)
  • Slavery (1)
  • SMOPS (2)
  • Spirit World Visions (9)
  • Statistics (1)
  • Testimony (6)
  • Theology (1,665)
  • Tree of Life (3)
  • Trinity (4)
  • UKMT (1)
  • Uncategorized (7)
  • Unconditional Love (14)
  • Understanding Evil (5)
  • Videos (1)
  • Water of Life (4)
  • Wicked Spirit Saved (14)
  • Women (5)
  • Zionism (6)
© Copyright 2014 - 2022 Anonymous Christian | All Rights Reserved.